logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.09.14 2017고단4258
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, he/she shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 4258] The Defendants conspired to receive insurance money from the insurance company by receiving the insurance money from the other vehicle driver without reporting a vehicle which is being invaded by the center line or has changed in the course while driving a vehicle.

1. Defendant A, B, C, and F’s joint criminal acts committed by Defendant A, B, and F are as follows: Defendant A, B, and C are on board the Ik7 car driven by F at the first lane in front of H Et in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul, around 17:50 on July 14, 2015; and F are on driving the said car while driving it.

Kchip car found to proceed beyond the central line on the opposite side and had it avoided the accident, and intentionally contacted the chip car without avoiding the accident, and caused the J to accept the accident to the victim Samsung Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., which is an insurance company to which it was a party.

Accordingly, in collusion with F, Defendant A, B, and C had a total of 10,155,560 won under the name of an agreement, treatment expenses, etc. as shown in attached Table 1, by deceiving a person in charge of dealing with the victim’s company’s accident as above, and the victim was paid from the victim.

2. Defendant A, B, D, and F’s joint criminal acts committed by Defendant A, B, and F are as follows: Defendant A, B, and D are on the back of the Mart located in Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City L on November 22 and 32, 2015; and F are on the Ik7 passenger vehicle operated by F on the back side of the Mart located in Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and F are on the way to intentionally contact the said SM5 passenger vehicle with F while driving the said vehicle without discovering and avoiding it on the opposite side.

Accordingly, Defendant A, B, and D, in collusion with F, deceiving the person in charge of dealing with the victim company's accident as above.

arrow