1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. Of the land size of 461 m2 in Seocheon-si, the attached drawing indication 1, 2, 3, 3.

1. The reasoning of this Court’s explanation in this case is as follows: (a) adding to Paragraph (2) the determination of the Plaintiff’s assertion added in the trial, and except for the conclusion otherwise, it is identical to that of the judgment of the first instance; and (b) cites it as it is by the text of Article 420

2. On June 2014, the fact that the Defendant paid only the rent from 2009 to 2013 under the instant lease agreement to the Plaintiff was in arrears in the year 2014, 2015, and that there was no dispute between the parties, and that the Plaintiff, on January 5, 2016, declared that the instant lease agreement was terminated on the grounds of the delinquency in rent for more than two years against the Defendant, is obvious in the record that the Plaintiff’s written brief delivered to the Defendant on January 8, 2016.

According to the above facts, the instant lease contract was terminated on or around January 8, 2016, on the ground of the fact that the Plaintiff’s declaration of intent to terminate the instant lease contract was delivered to the Defendant on the grounds of at least two years of rent delay, and barring any special circumstance, the Defendant is obligated to remove the said warehouse and neighborhood facilities and deliver the instant land to the Plaintiff, barring any special circumstance.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted with merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is unfair with different conclusions. Thus, the court of first instance revokes the judgment of the court of first instance and ordered the defendant to perform it. It is so decided as per Disposition.