The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant recognized the crime of this case, and is in depth divided into them, and the fact that the crime was committed in a contingent state at the time of this case, etc. is favorable to the defendant.

However, the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that the sentence became final and conclusive on January 1, 2014, which was committed on January 1, 2014, when he was sentenced to a suspended sentence on the grounds of the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective injury, deadly weapons, etc.) at the Changwon District Court’s branch on December 24, 2013. The Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that there was no special change in circumstances that the lower judgment and the sentence were different from the lower court, the sentencing criteria of the Sentencing Commission (the scope of recommending punishment: between June and April 1), the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, the background and consequence of the environmental crime, the means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., and the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments of the instant case cannot be deemed to be unfair, comprehensively taking account of various circumstances, it cannot be deemed that the Defendant’s sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.