(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2014.10.14 2014고단343

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2014.10.14 2014고단343

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등폭행)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 343"

1. On June 25, 2014, at around 02:30 on June 25, 2014, the Defendant listened to the victim C (nivers, age 46) of the victim C (nivers, women-friendly job offers, and had a dispute with the victim during the dispute with the victim, and made the victim her face 5 times with her hand-on her two knives and 10 times with her hand-on her two knives and two knives of the victim, and added part of the knive knives (7cm length of knives) of the victim’s face to the right side.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

2. On June 25, 2014, at around 04:40, the injured Defendant: (a) 20 times away from the victim’s body room on the ground that the victim would escape from the Defendant; (b) her clocks 20 times with the victim’s hand floor; and (c) her flocks and tacks away from the victim’s body, and her flocks away from the victim’s body; and (d) her flacks the victim’s body flacks the victim’s body flock in need of approximately 4 weeks of treatment; and (e) her fl

The Defendant stated that “Around March 31, 2009, the Defendant would repay the amount of money to the construction site located in Seoul, if he/she lends money to the Defendant that is necessary to pay the material cost to the construction site located in Seoul, within the victim F (ma, 28 years of age) office located in E next to the building at the time of residence.”

However, the Defendant was not a director of the construction company, while the Defendant was not a director of the construction company, there was no particular property, and the personal debt was at least 87 million won, and the so-called “refluence” was made by lending money to another person, and thus, there was no intention or ability to complete payment even if he borrowed money from the victim.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such, and is on the same day from the victim.

참조조문

-폭력행위 등 처벌에 관한 법률

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 2016.10.21 2016고정67

-광주지방법원 순천지원 2013.05.15 2013고단561

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.08.23 2017고단1421

-창원지방법원 거창지원 2014.10.02 2014고합14

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.06.21 2013고합52