1. The defendant shall pay 45 million won to the plaintiff and 12% per annum from November 1, 2019 to the date of complete payment.

In each statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (in particular, the statement in Gap evidence No. 2) and the purport of the whole argument can be seen as the reasons for the claim. Thus, the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff the amount of KRW 45 million and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 12% per annum under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from November 1, 2019 to the date of full payment, which is the day following the due date of the delay of payment stipulated in the written agreement.

The defendant asserts in the written reply that the other party to the obligation to pay the goods is C or D, not the plaintiff.

This assertion is different from the content of the agreement directly prepared by the defendant, and the defendant points this out by the court.

3. 10. The 10.m. did not appear on the first date for pleading without presenting any opinion to the 10.m. preparations order.

In the end, the court has rejected the cause of the claim of this case and there is no basis to accept the defendant's argument.

For this reason, a judgment of winning all the claims of the plaintiff is rendered.