Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

Defendant

A If a fine is not paid, it shall be 100.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the owner of the vehicle in which the 25 tons of bitler C is the owner of the vehicle, and the defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant Co., Ltd.") is the owner of the above bitler and the owner of the vehicle, which is established for transportation business.

1. The cargo vehicle that operates on the road of defendant A shall pass through the lane or place where the loading capacity measuring equipment is installed for the purpose of measuring the loading capacity;

Nevertheless, around 09:56 on July 8, 2020, the Defendant, at the main office located in Dong-dong, Kim Jong-dong, Kim Jong-si, Kim Jong-si, the Defendant, without entering the main office in the direction of the Southern-do Highway, into the cargo-only Happet with the cargo vehicle measuring equipment, operated the said Happler into the general cargo-free lane.

Therefore, the defendant, while operating a truck on the road, should pass through the lane or place where the loading quantity measuring equipment is installed to measure the loading quantity, but in violation of this, interfered with the measurement of the loading quantity.

2. The Defendant Company, at the time, and at the place specified in Paragraph 1, committed the above-mentioned violation by the Defendant, a person who is a beneficiary of the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes in a certified copy of the register of the corporation which is a violation of the restriction on the operation of national expressways, illegal vehicle transit photographs;

1. Article 115 subparagraph 5 of Article 115 and Article 78 (3) of the Road Act; Articles 116 and 115 subparagraph 5 of the Road Act; and Articles 78 (3) of the Road Act;

1. Defendant A to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act or more.