The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (one hundred months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant’s health condition is not good and thus there was no case where the Defendant should actually undergo hospital treatment, most insurance are terminated, and the fact that there was no criminal history is favorable to the Defendant.

On the other hand, the following is disadvantageous.

It is necessary to strictly punish insurance fraud in terms of impairing the foundation of the insurance system by impairing the purpose of the insurance system, promoting speculative spirit, causing sacrifice of many peoples of good insurance policy.

The defendant's criminal period is not shorter than the period, and the amount of damage is also 155,598,933 won.

The damage has not been recovered almost, and it was not agreed with the victim.

In addition, in full view of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, etc., and various sentencing conditions as shown in the instant records and arguments, even if considering the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.