logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.05.14 2018가합112537
청구이의
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. As to the case of application for the suspension of compulsory execution by this Court, this Court shall have regard to the case of application for the suspension of compulsory execution by 2018 Chicago10159.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a stock company with the purpose of collecting and transporting construction waste, and the Defendants are shareholders who hold shares equivalent to not less than 3/100 of the Plaintiff.

B. 1) The Defendants filed an application against the Plaintiff for provisional disposition on inspection and copying of the accounting books, etc. with Seoul Southern District Court 2016Kahap20416. On April 10, 2017, the said court rendered a decision that “the Plaintiff or its agent must allow the Defendants or their agents to peruse and copy (including photographing and copying of computer diskettes) only within business hours during the pertinent fiscal year from the obligor’s principal office, for 30 days to 30 days after the delivery date of the original copy of the instant decision, excluding holidays.” 2) The Plaintiff provided the Defendants with the documents listed in paragraph (1) of the 1 List from 2012 to 2016 to the 2016 fiscal year. The Plaintiff provided the documents listed in paragraph (2) of the 2007 to 2016 fiscal year from 200 to 2016 fiscal year from 200 to 2016 fiscal year from 200 to 2016 fiscal year.

C. The Defendants filed an application against the Plaintiff for a provisional disposition against the Plaintiff to allow perusal of accounting books, etc. as Seoul Southern District Court 2017Kahap20217, and the said court on August 22, 2017, “1. The Plaintiff must allow the Defendants or their agents to peruse and copy (including photographs and reproduction of computer diskettes) the books and documents listed in the separate sheet 2 for 30 days, excluding legal holidays, from three days after the service date of the original copy of the instant decision to the Defendants or their agents.

2. The Plaintiff has failed to perform the duty specified in paragraph (1).

arrow