logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.06.28 2018고정407
폐기물관리법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is a corporation established for the purpose of construction waste disposal business, etc., who is located in Gyeonggi-do Group D, a person who served as the head of A, and the Defendant is a corporation.

Any person who intends to collect, transport, store, and dispose of wastes shall collect, transport, and store wastes by classifying them according to their kind and nature, their recyclability by condition, whether they are inflammable or combustibility, and comply with the waste treatment standards and methods, such as incineration, etc.

C From February 20, to February 24, 2017, from around February 20, 2017 to February 24, 2017, the Defendant’s workplace (hereinafter “Defendant”) disposed of wastes equivalent to approximately 37 tons of the workplace wastes selected from the Defendant’s construction wastes in compliance with the waste disposal standards. However, upon entering into an entrustment contract for waste disposal with E (F) with the volume of daily waste storage in which the daily waste storage quantity was less than six tons, the Defendant’s workplace (hereinafter “Defendant”) discharged and disposed of each waste of the 17 tons of February 20, 2017; and accordingly, the fire occurred in Kimpo-si, H, I, J, and K where the said waste was loaded.

As a result, C, the employee of the defendant, has contaminated the surrounding environment by disposing of wastes in violation of waste disposal standards.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the records of the instant case, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone was proven without reasonable doubt that the Defendant contaminated the surrounding environment by treating wastes in violation of waste disposal standards, as stated in the facts charged in the instant case.

It is insufficient to view it, and there is no other evidence to prove it.

A. The defendant company served as the chief of department at the defendant company

C In the investigative agency, the defendant company introduced mixed wastes to classify them through the process of equipment screening, human resources screening, machinery screening, etc., and treat them according to the standards for disposal of the relevant wastes. The representative director of E around January 2017.

arrow