Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, the defendant A shall be sentenced to the above punishment for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 2013, 2013, Defendant A: (a) had the victim FF operate the above E’s subordinate business office at the office of the Defendant’s management Co., Ltd., Co., Ltd., Ltd., located in D 207 at the early October 2013, Defendant A: (b) did not temporarily purchase money from the victim, even if he/she was paid the money for purchasing the said E’s five rental car in a lump sum; (c) was thought to purchase the money by borrowing it from a non-MF social Co., Ltd.; and (d) the remainder of the money excluding KRW 29,451,300,00, including acquisition tax to purchase the said rental car in a lump sum, was thought to be consumed for personal purposes; (d) however, the victim had the victim purchased the said 168,00,000,000 temporary purchase of the said vehicle for five rental cars in a lump sum.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, was transferred to the deposit account in the name of G, KRW 10 million around October 29, 2013, KRW 40 million around November 2, 201 of the same year, and KRW 50,68 million around the 15th day of the same month to the deposit account in the name of G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Statement made by the defendant A in the fifth public trial records;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A written appeal;

1. A complaint;

1. A copy of a name box and a business registration certificate;

1. Inquiry of transaction details;

1. Written estimate;

1. Original Register of Automobile Registration;

1. Details, etc. of the remaining places of business;

1. Automobile registration certificate;

1. Details of the settlement of accounts of subordinate business offices;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the copies of bankbooks and transaction details;

1. Relevant Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (defendant A), and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The amount equivalent to 3.3 million won, which is part of the price obtained by the defendant for the reason of sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, is returned to the victim, and the vehicle has been continuously paid since then, the damage to the victim is not realized.