All of the first and second original judgments shall be reversed.

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for five years, for three years, for Defendant B.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence that Defendant A, B, C, and D first instance court sentenced to the above Defendants (the 4 years of imprisonment with prison labor for Defendant A, 2 years of imprisonment for Defendant B, 1 year and 6 months of imprisonment for Defendant C, and 1 year and 6 months of imprisonment for Defendant D) is too unreasonable.

⑵ 피고인 E ㈎ 사실오인 및 법리오해(제1원심판결에 대하여) 피고인 E은 H이 운전과 잔심부름을 해주면 사례비를 주겠다고 하여 운전 등을 해준 것일 뿐, H 등이 이 사건 범행을 실행한다는 사실을 알지 못하였기에 범행을 공모하거나 실행을 분담한 사실이 없다.

Even if Defendant E participated in the instant crime, it is recognized that Defendant E participated in the instant crime

Even if the above defendant constitutes an aiding and abetting crime, the above defendant should be deemed as such.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the first instance which found the above defendant guilty on the ground that he was a co-principal of the crime of this case is erroneous in misunderstanding of facts and misapprehending of legal principles.

㈏ 양형부당(제1원심판결 및 제2원심판결에 대하여) 피고인 E에 대하여 제1원심이 선고한 형(징역 1년 6개월) 및 제2원심이 선고한 형(징역 6개월)은 너무 무거워서 부당하다.

⑶ 피고인 F ㈎ 사실오인 피고인 F은 차를 운전하여 남편인 피고인 C을 강원도에서 울산까지 데려다 주었을 뿐, 이 사건 범행에는 전혀 가담한 바가 없다.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the first instance which found the above defendant guilty on the ground that he was a co-principal of the crime of this case is erroneous in mistake of facts.

㈏ 양형부당 제1원심이 피고인 F에 대하여 선고한 형(징역 1년 6개월)은 너무 무거워서 부당하다.

B. Prosecutor: The first instance court’s sentence of unfair sentencing (as to the first instance court’s judgment) against the Defendants is too uneasible and unfair.

2. We examine ex officio prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal ex officio.

A. Of the first instance judgment, the part on Defendant E and the second lower judgment, the part on Defendant E in the first instance judgment.