logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.08.25 2020고단3153
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a business owner of the “E” in the 7th floor C and D of the building B at the Namyang-si.

From August 9, 2019 to November 15:00 of the same year, the Defendant received sexual traffic charges (80,000,000 won to 160,000 won) from female customers who had found their places at the above E business establishment, and had the above customers do sexual intercourse with three female employees, such as F, employed by the Defendant, and sexual intercourse.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Advertisement of commercial sex acts and closures of the back-up devices;

1. Details of account transactions;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (report on the calculation of additional collection charges);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order reflects the defendant's mistake while recognizing the crime, the defendant has no criminal records that exceed the same criminal records and fines, other business size and business period, criminal records of the defendant, age, character and conduct, environment, etc., and various conditions of sentencing specified in the argument of this case shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the circumstances of sentencing.

arrow