1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Details of the disposition

The deceased C (hereinafter referred to as "the deceased") was dispatched from July 2015 to E-Hybae Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Hybaeba") as an employee belonging to the Korea Software ADC Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Sbaba") and served.

On September 2, 2015, the deceased was forced to contact after leaving his office, and accordingly, the deceased was found to be in a state of being arbitred in a bed around 09:00 on September 4, 2015, based on the work rent that visited the deceased’s residence.

The Plaintiffs, the parents of the Deceased, asserted that the deceased’s death constitutes occupational accidents, and claimed the Defendant for the payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses. On June 7, 2016, the Defendant rendered a disposition of survivors’ benefits and funeral funeral expenses on the ground that “The Defendant did not have any sudden or sudden change in the situation related to the work prior to the illness, and the short-term and chronic division is not objectively verified, and it is difficult to view that the deceased’s duty burden is a direct stress factor to the extent that the deceased’s death may cause death.”

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). 【The ground for recognition” did not dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the entire arguments and arguments as to the legitimacy of the Disposition in this case, the gist of the plaintiffs’ assertion was that the non-party company was in charge of duties that could not be able to cope with due to his career or ability as a result of the non-party company’s dispatch of his career to Hyba-B-B-B-based fishing before the death was about 2 months before the death, and accordingly, it led to acute heart funeral at the end of severe stress. Thus, there is a proximate causal relation between the death and the duty

It shall be as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

In fact, on February 27, 2012, the deceased, such as the duties of the deceased, was employed by the non-party company on February 27, 2012, and was dispatched to another company for the development of the program. During the period of absence of dispatch, the deceased was waiting to work at the non-party company

The Deceased on March 2015.