logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.09.06 2019고단12
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 2:20 on December 1, 2018, the Defendant: (a) committed an assault by the police officer E belonging to the police station D District Unit of the Cheongju Police Station, who was called for, after receiving a report from the Defendant on the Defendant’s 112 statement that the Defendant fright to walk, and (b) stated that the Defendant’s fright to walk, she would be able to see the horses “I peep the same rings, rings, I will do so; and (c) the Defendant assaulted the police officer E in a manner, such as, in his/her hand, trying to cover the left chest of the police officer E in his/her hands.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers to interfere with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The witness E and F’s statements and defense counsel did not assault the police, and the police officer did not know that the defendant did not have a fright, such as shouldering Byung at the main point at the time of the instant case, but did not have a frightt, and they denied the charges of this case to the effect that it constitutes illegal execution of duties due to the problem in the process of arresting flagrant offenders. However, according to the witness testimony of each of the above witnesses, the defendant reported to the police officer of this case by doing acts such as shouldering Byung at the main point at the time of the instant case, and reported the principal offender to the police officer. The defendant attempted to keep the chest of the police officer E at the face as stated in the facts charged. The police officer’s arrest of the defendant against the suspect under the suspicion of obstruction of performance of official duties by observing the procedure such as notifying the defendant of the fright principle, and even if the defendant did not do not do so as alleged in the defendant’s domestic affairs, it is difficult to view the reporter, etc. to have made a request for the above physical category of the defendant and defense counsel.

arrow