logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2015.12.03 2014고단421
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 13, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collective, deadly weapons, etc.) at the Changwon District Court on September 13, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence on April 24, 2014.

On July 24, 2014, around 18:10, the Defendant brought a dispute with the victim E (the age of 58) and the drinking value payment at the D cafeteria located in Syang-si C, and brought an injury to the victim, such as the head of an open room, where treatment for about 14 days was required, due to an empty disease under the depositor, and the victim was able to bring an end part of the victim to the public.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Each photograph;

1. Previous records: Criminal records and other inquiries, and the application of each Act and subordinate statutes on criminal investigation reports;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The proviso to Article 35 and the proviso to Article 42 of the Criminal Act among repeated offenders;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation [the scope of recommending punishment] [Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act / [the scope of recommending punishment] There is no basic area (two to four years) (two-four years) of habitual injury, repeated injury, and special injury [the decision of sentencing] / [the decision of sentencing] of this case / The method of criminal punishment of this case is very dangerous, as well as the defendant committed the crime of this case since the defendant was sentenced to a punishment of the same kind of crime and was not yet released from the court, considering the fact that the defendant was not agreed with the victim, the sentence is against the defendant, and all other circumstances such as the relationship between the defendant and the victim, the circumstances surrounding the crime of this case, and

arrow