A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Attachment] On December 20, 2006, the Defendant purchased KRW 1,845 square meters from K before Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun (hereinafter “instant land”). On April 20, 2010, the Defendant applied for permission to occupy and use a small river to open part of the N, adjacent to the instant land (hereinafter “the application site for permission to occupy and use the instant land”) under his/her own name, but at the time, the Defendant applied for permission to occupy and use the small river under the name of his/her father-O, Hongcheon-gun Office L and P belonging to the Hongcheon-gun Office for permission to open the small river as a result of on-site inspection on April 9, 2010, on the ground of the current status of the application for permission to occupy and use the instant farmland under the name of Hongcheon-gun-gun, Hongcheon-gun-gun, Hongcheon-gun, and the Defendant returned it to the Defendant at the time of his/her business trip 20 to open the small river.

On October 27, 2010, the Defendant sold the instant land to T in KRW 50 million, and on behalf of T, on October 27, 2011, in order to file an application for permission to occupy and use a small river to re-establish the site of the instant application for permission to occupy and use a farmland, the Defendant: (a) requested the representative of the KNU to conduct a survey on the current status of the instant land; (b) ordered CW directors to suspend their duties for applying for permission to occupy and use a small river; and (c) on July 2012, the Defendant requested T to request WW directors for a design to install a bridge in front of the instant land; and (d) failed to enter into a bridge construction contract, on a regular basis, after requesting a field inspection on the river in front of the instant land.

As the Defendant worked as Q Q on November 12, 2015, the defect in the request that “T purchased the instant land from the Defendant from the Defendant during Q in service,” and that “T” purchased from the Defendant to Q, constitutes a defect, and the instant case in lieu of T.V.