1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff initially entered the Republic of Korea on March 17, 2015, with the status of stay D-4 (General Training), which was March 17, 2015, and returned to the Republic of Korea on November 26, 2016, with the status of stay C-3 (Short-term Visit) (Short-3).

B. On December 28, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for recognition of refugee status with the Defendant, but on June 19, 2017, the Defendant rendered a disposition on the recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize “profuges having sufficient grounds for fear of persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).

C. On July 24, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice against the instant disposition. However, the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the same ground on March 21, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 1 to 3, and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff participated in a demonstration led by students, or posted anti-government posts on Internet Blobs, etc.

On September 2016, the Plaintiff prepared a large-scale demonstration that was scheduled to be held in the last week, but was arrested and detained by the personnel of the intelligence agency around August 2016.

The plaintiff was able to unsatise only when his body was dissatisfyd due to such a satisfying and detention, but it was found that there was no reason to remain any further means.

The plaintiff is a means of nationality of the plaintiff.