Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
Details of the disposition
On January 24, 2006, the Plaintiff, a foreigner of the nationality of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter referred to as "Pakicistan"), has first entered the Republic of Korea as a sojourn status for technical training (D-3, the period of sojourn one year), changed the status of stay for training employment (E-8), and stayed in the Republic of Korea as a non-professional employment (E-9), and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on March 6, 2012, which is the day preceding the expiration date of the period of stay (E-9 March 7, 2012).
On December 3, 2013, the Defendant issued a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that there was no “probably-founded fear of persecution” (see Article 2 subparag. 3 of the Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 2012); Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees; Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees).
The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on February 6, 2014, but was dismissed on September 30, 2014.
【In the absence of dispute, the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case as to Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, and Eul’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 1, and 2, and the purport of the entire pleading as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case has been supported from 2004, and Eul, which is the member of the Cpolitical Party (hereinafter “C”), was deemed to have caused the Plaintiff on January 13, 201, filed a complaint with the police and said Eul would die the Plaintiff’s Dong-gu.
As such, even though there is a risk that the Plaintiff would be stuffed on the grounds of political opinion when the Plaintiff returned to Pakistan, the Defendant did not recognize the Plaintiff as a refugee, and the instant disposition is unlawful.
It shall be as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.
In full view of the following circumstances that can be seen by adding up the respective descriptions of the evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 (including virtual numbers) and the overall purport of the pleadings, the Plaintiff shall be subject to full consideration of all the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff and all the circumstances alleged by this court.