logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.08.22 2014고단4457
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

A number of seized PC hard diskss and one main body (No. 1) and USBmeri, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No one shall knowingly receive any divulged personal information for profit or any unlawful purpose;

Nevertheless, around July 2013, the Defendant: (a) around the office near the office of operation of the Dong located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, “it is difficult to send books for promotional activities on behalf of clients because there is no telephone number of customers using the recent substitute driving; (b) customer numbers are changed; (c) the Defendant sent approximately 12,602,324 items of customer information listed in attached Table 1, which consists of the number of the substitute driver (including call center), company name, customer contact number, time of receipt completion, place of departure, destination, charges, etc., and knew that the file was leaked on the site of the substitute driver (F, G); and (d) took care of the USB copy containing the file from E, using personal information stored in the USB copy from that time to June 18, 2014.

Accordingly, the Defendant knew of the divulged personal information, received the personal information for profit or for an unlawful purpose.

2. No person who divulges another person's secrets shall divulge another person's secrets processed, stored or transmitted through the information and communications network.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, upon the request of H to the effect that “in-house (H) operates a substitute driver company,” the call will be increased. A substitute driver company (including call center) number, company name, customer contact number, time of receipt completion, departure, destination, charges, etc. as described in paragraph (1) is disclosed on the site of the substitute driver company, even though he/she knows that 12,602,324 items of the substitute driver customer information listed in attached Table 1, which was composed of the number of the substitute driver company (including call center), customer contact number, time of receipt completion, departure, destination, charges, etc., during August 2013, 2013, the Defendant was aware of the divulgence at the site of the substitute driver company.

arrow