Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On December 17, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 17:00 on December 17, 2012, the Defendant: (b) 204 of the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu Seoul Building 204, on the ground that the victim was unable to repay the borrowed money; (c) caused the victim’s arms and breath to go beyond the floor; and (d) caused the victim to face with the victim’s right-hand kne on the flag, which was located outside the floor; and (d) caused the victim to suffer injury, such as the removal of the right-hand flag, which requires the victim’s medical treatment

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D, and part of the witness E’s legal statement;

1. Application of investigation reports, investigation reports (verification of details of medical treatment), diagnosis reports, investigation reports (Submission of diagnosis certificates), investigation reports (suspects, etc.), and emergency medical services-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 262 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted on the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order. The defendant asserts that the defendant is not guilty, since he did not breathize the victim's breath as stated in the facts of crime, and the victim was faced with his breath at the place where the occurrence of this case occurred

According to the above macroscopic evidence, the victim filed a complaint against the defendant more than 2 months after the occurrence of the instant case, and the medical record includes "inwards", "inscopics", and "inscopics of aquatic source", but the above macroscopic evidences are acknowledged as follows. In other words, the victim seems not to file a complaint immediately after the instant case for smooth resolution due to friendly relations with the defendant. Even according to the witness F's testimony, there was a physical fighting between the defendant and the victim, and the victim's statement from the investigative agency to this court.