1. Defendant B’s KRW 11,770,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from December 19, 2018 to April 23, 2019.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff, under the trade name of “E”, purchased heavy construction equipment, such as refacing season, and exported them to a foreign country. Defendant B is a person engaged in the construction equipment trade brokerage business, and Defendant D and C are co-owners of the refacing season listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant refacing season”), and the name of the owner in the public record was Defendant D.

B. On November 2, 2017, the Plaintiff purchased the instant digging machine from Defendant C with the introduction of Defendant B at KRW 30 million and KRW 1 million for introduction, and paid KRW 6 million on the same day. On November 9, 2017, the Plaintiff paid the remaining KRW 25 million to Defendant C by means of remitting it to Defendant C, and received the said digging machine.

다. 원고는 이 사건 굴삭기를 인도받은 후 위 굴삭기가 수출에 필요한 규격인 스탠다드붐보다 약 30cm 짧은 숏붐이라는 사실을 알게 되었고, 수출을 위해 스탠다드붐으로 개조하는 비용으로 11,770,000원을 지출하였다. 라.

On the other hand, the procedure, such as cancellation of registration necessary for the export of the excavation machines of this case, was completed around February 1, 2019.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's entries or images, Eul's evidence Nos. 1, 2-1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14-2, Eul's evidence No. 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

가. 숏붐 사실 미고지로 인한 손해배상청구 부분에 대한 판단 (1) 원고 주장의 요지 피고 B은 이 사건 굴삭기 매매를 중개한 사람으로서, 피고 C은 매도인으로서, 위 피고들은 원고에게 위 굴삭기가 숏붐임을 알리지 아니한 채 매도하였고, 이로 인하여 원고는 위 굴삭기를 수출하기 위하여 스탠다드붐으로 수리하는 비용 11,770,000원을 지출하였는바, 위 피고들은 연대하여 원고에게 위 수리비 상당을 배상할 책임이 있다.

(2) The following circumstances, which are acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments presented in the judgment as to the claim against Defendant B, that is, the Plaintiff prior to the sale of the instant excavation machine.