1. The remaining amount of money obtained by deducting the auction expenses from the proceeds of sale by selling the land of Pyeongtaek-si Do to auction the land of 3173 square meters; and

The Plaintiff and the Defendants hold 1/3 shares of each of the 3173 square meters of Pyeongtaek-si D Forest land (hereinafter “instant forest”). The fact that the Plaintiff and the Defendants did not reach an agreement with each of the parties on the method of dividing the forest of this case may be acknowledged by the descriptions in Gap evidence 1 and 2, either there is no dispute between the parties, or there is no agreement between the parties.

Considering that the location, area and surrounding areas of the forest of this case, which can be seen by comprehensively considering the purpose of the entire records and pleadings, and that the Plaintiff wants to divide the price for the forest of this case, and that there is no particular objection, it is difficult to find an appropriate method of in-kind division corresponding to the share ratio of the Plaintiff and the Defendants, and it is reasonable to divide the forest of this case by selling it at auction and dividing the price for