1. The Defendants deliver to the Plaintiff the buildings listed in the attached list.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

Comprehensively taking account of the descriptions in Gap 1 through 11 (including the branch numbers), the plaintiff is a redevelopment association established for a housing redevelopment project with the area of H G W W W WW 62,245.8 square meters in Mapo-gu, and the head of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government approves the management and disposal plan for the plaintiff's housing redevelopment project on December 8, 2014 and announced it on March 12, 2015. The defendants are co-owners of buildings listed in the attached list in the above business area, and the defendants are subject to cash liquidation. The plaintiff deposited 374,607,440 won each of the defendants on March 9, 2016 pursuant to the expropriation ruling of the local Land Tribunal of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendants have the duty to deliver the buildings listed in the attached list to the plaintiff.

Although the Defendants asserted that they did not receive any lawful compensation, they may not oppose the Plaintiff’s request for extradition on the ground that the Plaintiff deposited the compensation pursuant to the ruling of acceptance, so long as they could bring an objection against the administrative litigation.