1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff falling under the following order for payment shall be revoked.

1. The first instance court of the scope of inquiry of this Court is as follows among the lawsuit of this case:

2.(b)

24,369,646 won based on the First Bill of Lading and damages for delay in respect of 24,115,280 won, respectively, were dismissed, and the remainder of the claims against the Defendants was dismissed.

As the Plaintiff did not object to the dismissed part as above, the dismissed part as above does not constitute the subject of this Court’s adjudication.

2. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff shall submit a letter of credit and a bill of lading issuance 1) The Plaintiff shall BBB Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “BB”).

B) On April 4, 2014, the Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant A”) entered into an import L/C credit transaction agreement with USD 195,570 on the maximum amount of credit and opened an import L/C for the products imported from China. The Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant A”) is the goods shipping agent of the clothing products imported from China by BBB. Defendant B is the representative director of the Defendant B. The Defendant Co., Ltd. instructed the consignor to the Seoul Branch of JIXINGY YG YG NANNG NA, KITNG NANG NAD NAD NADS, consignee, the Defendant Co., Ltd. directed the Seoul Branch of the Seoul Branch of the Seoul Bank, the place of departure, the port of entry, the port of entry, the port of entry, and the bill of lading No. 254, Apr. 27, 2014, the bill of lading No. 2015, May 24, 2014

B. 1) Cargo as indicated in No. 1 bill of lading (hereinafter referred to as “No. 1 Cargo”)

) The Cargo indicated in the Second Bill of Lading Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Second Cargo”) shall be deemed to be the Cargo in the Second Bill of Lading Co., Ltd.

) The goods indicated in the third bill of lading (hereinafter referred to as “third-party goods”) at Han-jin International Bonded Warehouse Co., Ltd. and Nos. 1, 2, 2.