1. The Defendant’s KRW 21,809,865 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from June 13, 2015 to May 11, 2017.

1. Claim for the price of goods;

A. On September 172, 2014, the Defendant provided the Plaintiff with a total of 1,173,007 won (50 won) from the Plaintiff on September 172, 2014 (unit price of 650 won), 339, 798 (unit price of 600 won), 476,611 (unit price of 550 won), and 1,179 (unit price of 550 won) on December 184, 2014, 740,858,264 won (unit price of 550 won) (unit price of 740,858,264 won (unit price of 3,224,342 won) and expenses of 2,653,794 won incurred on October 1, 2014) minus the amount of KRW 608,574,607,507,579.

B) Although there is no cause attributable to the Plaintiff, the agreement to deduct defective costs is null and void as an unfair juristic act, or revoked by the Defendant’s coercion. (2) Defendant A) supplied 1,173,007 units to the Plaintiff, but agreed to pay the Plaintiff in proportion to other companies with respect to the defective or inferior products which were lost in the process of first, second, and third processes. As such, the Plaintiff agreed to deduct 10,141 units of the unit price as of September 9, 2014 and October 10, 2014 should be deducted. (b) The unit price as of November 2014, 200, the unit price as of November 20, 2014, and the unit price as of December 500, 2014, and the unit price as of December 1, 2014 would be reduced to KRW 500,000,000.

C) The Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the unpaid amount of KRW 46,03,369, which was calculated based on the unit price set forth in subsection (b) and KRW 732,88,165,165- Unpaid amount of KRW 46,03,369-paid amount of KRW 680,578,720, as stated in the column for the unpaid amount of the comprehensive statement of transaction (Evidence 9) in attached Form 6,276,072, as stated in subparagraph 9.

B. Around September 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) processed and supplied a gallon jugno-4 mobile phone aluminium case to the Defendant; and (b) the price of the goods ordered by the Defendant is based on the estimates and documents attached thereto, which the Plaintiff submits to the Defendant, based on the quantity, quality, quantity, quantity, payment period, method of payment, material price, labor cost, or market price trends; and (c) reasonable calculation method calculated in addition to appropriate management expenses and profits.