A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 21, 2015, the Defendant, at the first floor of the D D club located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, committed an indecent act by force against the victim E (if the victim is 22 years of age) by approaching the female from the aftermath of the female, making the female’s her her her son’s her son with his her her her own son.

2. On March 21, 2015, the Defendant: (a) accessed from the back of the victim F (V, 21 years old) of the Defendant’s friendly job offering victim F (M, 21 years old) at once on the first floor of the new wall around March 21, 2015; and (b) committed an indecent act by force against the Defendant by making his her her son’s her

3. On March 21, 2015, the Defendant: (a) accessed the victim E from the first floor of the instant D club on the new wall around March 21, 2015; and (b) committed an indecent act by force by deceiving the female’s chest on his/her own hand.

The Defendant, as above, committed an indecent act against the victims on three occasions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F and G;

1. CCTV video CDs (the Defendant denied all facts charged in the instant case where there was no fact that the victims were dead, but each of the legal statements by the victims and G present at this court as witnesses is consistent and specific. The witness appears to have no motive or incentive to make a false report by being identified as identical to the Defendant on the first day of the instant case. According to the CCTV video CDs, according to the victim E and G, the victim E and G appeared to have a scene of resistance against the Defendant within the instant club, which are mixed with people, without any justifiable reason. The victim E and their friendly G, who were playing in the instant club on the day of the instant case, committed such act without any reason.

In light of all circumstances, such as the fact that it is difficult to see, the fact of crime in the judgment is sufficiently recognized, so the defendant's above assertion is without merit).

1. Relevant Article 298 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Suspension of execution;