logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2013.04.04 2012고단1108
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accidenting Measures) are those engaged in driving a new or passenger vehicle;

On November 16, 2012, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 22:10, and operated the intersection in the vicinity of the valley, which is located in the ancient city of the Gyeongnam-do, along the three-lanes from the parallel to the parallel in the horizontal direction.

At the time, there is a duty of care to safely drive according to the signals by reducing speed and checking the right and the right and the right of the driver, since it is night, and it is a private crossing where traffic is controlled by the signal apparatus at all times.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the error of driving the vehicle in violation of the signal to the erode from the edge of the erode by the erode of the vehicle driven by the victim C(28 years of age) who was driven by the erode in accordance with the erode by the erode of the two-lanes of the two-lanes, the front part of the vehicle driven by the Defendant.

At the same time, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, sustained injury, such as light saves that require treatment for about three weeks, and at the same time, destroyed the repair cost of the said saves to ensure that the repair cost of the said saves is equivalent to KRW 609,950, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as stopping, and providing relief to the victim.

2. Around November 16, 2012, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (ex post facto action) (hereinafter “Road Traffic Act”), driving a new-beer or a vehicle on the said date, led the Defendant to the intersection of the long-distance distance in the border of the Gyeong-dong at the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the road.

At the time, since it is night and a place where a center line is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to reduce speed and drive safely by checking well the right and the right and the right.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so.

arrow