logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원군산지원 2013.11.21 2013가단1292
토지인도
Text

1. The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) indicated the attached Form 7, 8, 9, 10, among the area of 1500 square meters in the warehouse C in Gunsan-si.

Reasons

The main lawsuit and counterclaim are also finite.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a 1500 square meters of land for warehouse C in Gunsan-si, Gunsan-si, which was owned by D (hereinafter “instant land”).

(2) The instant land owned by the Defendant is adjacent to the instant neighboring land, which is the owner who completed the registration of ownership transfer on May 17, 1989. 2) The instant adjacent land is divided into the E-gi-si, Gunsan-si, Do, and 473 square meters (hereinafter “the instant adjacent land”) and the F large scale 264 square meters (hereinafter “the instant Gu F land”). The instant adjacent land was subdivided into the instant adjacent land on May 31, 201, and was finally subdivided into the instant adjacent land on June 10, 201.

3) As to the previous land of this case, L, through H and I, completed the registration of ownership transfer on March 13, 1985, and on October 8, 2007, M completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of gift by M, and on May 6, 201, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of sale and purchase. On January 17, 1989, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer on the land of this case through H, J, and K, the owner of the adjacent land of this case, which was completed by the Defendant as of January 17, 1989. (B) The current status of land possession 1) the former land of this case was located on the land of this case, which was constructed before about 40 years prior to the boundary of the previous land of this case, and the wall of this case was located on the land of this case and acquired the ownership of this case from around 197, the Defendant purchased the land of this case, including the land of this case.

2) On the ground of the previous F land of this case, there was a wooden house that had been approved for use in around 1925. However, around 40 years, the fence of the instant house installed prior to around 40 years also exceeded the boundary of the previous F land of this case, and part 101 square meters in the annexed drawing (C) of the instant land (hereinafter “the instant land”).

arrow