logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원여주지원 2011.11.24 2010가단16122
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. As Plaintiff C’s children, there was a physical and speech development delay from the time of birth to the age of six due to problems such as nutrition, difficulty in water surface, etc. between Plaintiff C’s child and the time of surgery.

B. When the plaintiff A shows 1 and 2 years at the ASEAN Elementary School and the ASEAN Elementary School due to poor language development, the plaintiff A has a special team and lives;

In 2007, the third grade of elementary school was transferred to I elementary school in 2007, and the defendant D was enrolled in the first semester in 2009 and was assigned to six classes in which he was enrolled.

C. Plaintiff A, as seen above, appears to have an attitude of arguing against his desire during the process of growing with a future group due to the lack of sociality due to the delay in the development of language ability, which led to frequent disputes between him and his expression of opinion without clearly expressing his desire, and that it cannot be concentrated on the class hours, such as the conflict with Defendant D who intends to correct it, and thus, Plaintiff C resisted against Defendant D’s disposition against Plaintiff A, and filed a civil petition with the Office of Education, etc. at I Elementary School’s wife’s wife’s wife on June 11, 2009 (representative H), which was likely to cause the learning crisis, and Plaintiff A transferred to J Elementary School as of June 19, 2009.

Plaintiff

A is placed and living in a half of Nonparty K as a teacher at the J Elementary School;

In 2010, Defendant F entered the sixth year and was placed on the top of the class in which Defendant F was a teacher.

E. While the Plaintiff C filed a petition with the National Human Rights Commission against Defendant D, F, etc., the Commission investigated and made a decision to dismiss and dismiss the petition on the grounds that the petition did not constitute an act of infringement of human rights and did not constitute an act of infringement of human rights or an act of investigation by the Commission, and when the Plaintiff A was enrolled in the fifth and first semester of the I Elementary School.

arrow