Defendant

A Punishment of a fine of KRW 700,00 and a fine of KRW 1,500,00 shall be imposed on Defendant B.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B: (a) around December 18, 2012, the Defendant was boarding a bus called “D High School” located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, on the bus stops located in “D High School” located in Songpa-gu, and was driven by the injured party A (Nam and 5 years of age) at the bus stops; (b) however, the Defendant demanded that the injured party promptly depart from the bus bus.

As a result, spits or spits the victim's face into the victim's face, takes the face by drinking, and bats the bat.

As a result, the Defendant got off the part of the inner area that requires approximately three weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place of the above paragraph (1) above, carried the face of the victim B (manam, 52 years old) on drinking, carried out fat and pushed down with fat.

As a result, the defendant put the victim into a multi-faceted diversology that requires treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the suspect interrogation of each of the Defendants

1. Statement of the police statement against Defendant B;

1. Defendant B’s written statement

1. Video CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Republic of Korea, the Defendant asserts to the effect that it is self-defense, since it was true that the victim was at the time of fighting, or it was only the victim’s defense by inducing a fighting and by attacking the victim

However, it is difficult to view the act of attack and defense between the persons who make a fighting match as "political act" or "self-defense" or "self-defense" by leaving only one party's act, at the same time, as the act of attack and defense was committed simultaneously, and at the same time, one party's act is in nature, and thus, it is difficult to view it as constituting "political act" or "self-defense. According to the evidence examined above, when the defendant spawns the face of the victim while putting it into contact with the victim, it is blick in the