logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.07.22 2016구단7463
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea for a short period of time on April 2, 2001, ① a foreigner who falls under the status of stay for short-term (C-2) (amended by Presidential Decree No. 23274, Nov. 1, 201) [Attachment 1] of the Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 23274, Nov. 1, 201), or the scope of activities: A foreigner who intends to stay for a short period of time on and after the expiration of the period of stay ( May 2, 2001) (hereinafter referred to as the "period of stay for 5.1) and was granted a non-professional sojourn (E-9) status on and after the expiration of the period of stay for 1.5 days before the expiration of the period of stay (E-1, 207).

B. On October 23, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision to recognize refugee status (hereinafter the instant disposition) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the Plaintiff would be subject to persecution as a refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap 1, Eul 1, Eul 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff's assertion is that the state government owns the land owned by the plaintiff's family.

arrow