1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 12, 2007, B driven CM520 vehicles on June 12, 2007, and was driven by the Plaintiff’s bicycle riding on the front direction at the entrance direction of the parking lot at the 5-dong D apartment apartment parking lot in Ansan-gu. At the same time, the Plaintiff, who was 5 years of age, was faced with the face of bicycle finger due to his shock.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). B.

On June 13, 2007, after the accident of this case, the Plaintiff visited the E-type Foreign Department and was diagnosed as being in sacrife and co’s sacrife. The Plaintiff followed the diagnosis on June 14, 2007, which was conducted by visiting the Fanum Department to visit the members of the Fanum Department and received the diagnosis that it was in the coordinates between the inside and outside of the inner and internal area

C. On December 22, 2007, after approximately six months from the date of the instant accident, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “one’s inner pacific chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chron,” and subsequently was diagnosed as an unidentified chronic chronic chronic chron

At present, the hearing power of the plaintiff shows 80dB's dialogic hearing opinion on the left-hand and right-hand ear, and such dialogic state is permanent and there is no possibility of recovery through future treatment or re-operation.

E. The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with G as the owner of CA car.

[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 3, Gap evidence 4, Gap evidence 6, appraiser H's appraisal, and the result of the fact inquiry and the purport of the whole pleadings against Tol University Seoul Special Hospital

2. The plaintiff alleged that the accident of this case occurred to the right ear due to the accident of this case, and thus, the defendant is obligated to compensate the plaintiff for the damages incurred therefrom.

3. Each entry of the Plaintiff’s right-hand ear and the Plaintiff’s right-hand ear were written as to whether the instant accident occurred and as to whether the Plaintiff’s right-hand ear were written as follows.