A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) is a person operating the E Magaz shop on the third floor of the D Magazine D, while F (the claim for a summary order on September 27, 2013) is a chief of the office in charge of the management, etc. of sexual traffic women at the above establishment, and G (the claim for a summary order on September 27, 2013) is a father of the Defendant in charge of the weekly management

The Defendant and F, and G conspired, from November 7, 2012 to February 14, 2013, had three rooms, shower rooms, one camera, and laundry room at the above EMaMaab shop. The Defendant received an average of KRW 120,00 won from male grandchildren who found the above establishment, and the Defendant employed H, I (Disposition of Suspension of Prosecution on September 27, 2013), and J et al. obtained profits of approximately KRW 1,029,00 by having the above male grandchildren and sexual traffic women engage in sexual intercourse over about 343 occasions.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with F and G to arrange commercial sex acts.

2. No debt collector who violates the Fair Collection of Claims Act shall assault, threaten, arrest or detain a debtor or his/her related person in connection with debt collection, or use a deceptive scheme or force against him/her;

The defendant around October 201, the defendant is a creditor against the victim, such as lending 5 million won to the victim J (AW, 27 years of age) around 201.

The Defendant threatened the victim as follows on the ground that the victim did not pay the borrowed money properly as above.

On November 26, 2012, the Defendant talked with the purport that the Defendant would know to the husband and other family members of the Plaintiff of the fact that the Defendant would pay the amount of money to the victim, without having paid the amount of money to the Plaintiff, the Defendant would be able to pay the amount of money to the Plaintiff, and that the Plaintiff would know to the husband and other family members of the Plaintiff of the fact that the Plaintiff did not pay the amount of money to the Plaintiff.