1. The Defendant’s KRW 3,673,062 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 6% from April 1, 2016 to August 23, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. The pertinent Plaintiff is a business entity that newly built and sold a non-party to the treatment Motor Vehicle Sales Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “the instant apartment”) on the ground, non-party to the treatment Motor Vehicle Sales Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “the treatment Motor Vehicle Sales”) of the instant apartment, which is the construction work of the instant apartment.

B. (1) Upon obtaining approval from the competent authority for the housing construction project and the alteration thereof, the Plaintiff recruited the instant apartment occupants from June 2007. Since the sales of the instant apartment was completed the construction of the instant apartment, the Plaintiff was subject to a pre-sale inspection from the competent authority on August 6, 2009. (2) The instant apartment occupants filed a lawsuit seeking damages against the Plaintiff on the ground that the instant apartment was not constructed in accordance with the initial usage approval plan on February 10, 2010, as the Seoul Central District Court 2010 Ga1026, and the said court on December 15, 2011, on the ground that there was a defect that was constructed or was non-construction differently from the drawing for use approval, the Plaintiff, who was the project owner and the purchaser of the instant apartment, was not a joint owner of the instant apartment, and the Plaintiff, who was a party to the instant apartment, was not a joint owner of the instant apartment, to be treated as the Defendant’s claim for reimbursement and alteration of the portion of the instant apartment.

Since then, the occupants of the apartment of this case and the plaintiff filed an appeal against the above judgment, but the appeal was dismissed on October 24, 2012, and only the plaintiff was dismissed.