logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014.07.10 2013나54781
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

Basic Facts

The defendant medical corporation, the status of the party and the defendant medical corporation J (hereinafter "the defendant corporation") are medical corporations operating K Hospital located in the original city. The defendant I is a doctor working in the L Hospital, and the plaintiff is a patient who is currently showing symptoms, such as rain, urine, and urology, and urology, and disc removal.

On April 6, 2010, the Plaintiff complained of symptoms, such as abnormal radiation, etc., and applied to the emergency room of a L Hospital. As a result of an examination of the X-5-ray shooting conducted on the 3-4-5 ambrate, the Plaintiff hospitalized in the L Hospital on the same day for pain treatment by showing that the ambrates and the 3-4-5 ambrate ambrates (the verte is in the state where spine is sealed without normal arrangement) were presented at the intervals of disc, and the ambrates of the third ambrates.

On April 14, 2010, the Plaintiff was subject to drug treatment and physical therapy, but the symptoms were not improved. As a result of the MRI photograph test conducted on April 9, 2010, the Plaintiff received from Defendant I on April 14, 2010, under the judgment of the medical personnel that the 3-4 Monopoly verte inverte verts, the 3-4 Monopoly clisis, the 3-5 Manopoly clisis, the 4-5 Manopoly clisis, and the Manopoly clisis (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

After the operation, the Plaintiff returned to the sick room after completing the operation at around 14:40 on April 14, 2014. While the Plaintiff complained of the pains of the operating department several times from the time of the operation, the Plaintiff did not appeal both low fluences and pains.

Around 05:00 on April 15, 2014, the Plaintiff appealed that there was a little reduction in quantity. Defendant I confirmed the Plaintiff’s condition at the time of Jin-jin around 08:40, and Defendant I confirmed the Plaintiff’s condition at Gin-jin, which was not in accordance with his/her scientific inspection’s opinion, was normal.

The plaintiff is a low finite and pain that is not good even at around 19:40 on the same day.

arrow