A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Basic Facts] The Defendant agreed to register the preservation of ownership after entering into or completing construction-related contracts, such as purchase of land, or completion of construction-related contracts, with respect to D and Donam Construction Corporation (hereinafter “New Loan Corporation”) that came to know in the construction relationship before the instant case, and then performed the instant construction of loan from November 1, 2013 to April 2014. D performed the construction of new loan from November 19, 2013 to April 15, 2014 in total two times in the process of the instant construction, under the name of 69,579,459 won in total, from November 19, 2013 to April 15, 2014, transferred the foreign exchange bank account in the name of F of the Defendant’s wife to the new cooperative account in the name of G corporation used by the Defendant at the time, and paid KRW 49,181,100 at the construction site to the construction site, and paid KRW 49,181,1000 during the instant construction project and sale of gas.

On the other hand, with regard to the provision of the name of D in relation to the instant loan construction, the Defendant did not complete mutual consultation and settlement by either paying to D KRW 20 million in return for the provision of the name of D, or by transferring one of the loans of this case as completed.

[2] On June 10, 2015, around 16:00, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the purchase price case against 325 Plaintiff D, Defendant F, and three other parties in the Gwangju District Court Decision 102, which was located in 390, Seonam-gu, Namnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Seoul Special Metropolitan City Court Decision 201, Jun. 10, 2015). On June 10, 2015, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath of the above court as a witness of the purchase price case against Plaintiff D, Defendant F, and the Plaintiff’s agent (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) on the construction content of the instant construction work and the settlement of the accounts as to the provision of name D. This case’s construction experience

In the inquiry, “not participating,” but the house of the plaintiff couple is the field of the work, making a lot of cleaning, and harming waste disposal.

That is, the witness speaks.