logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2013.07.18 2013고정619
향토예비군설치법위반등
Text

A fine of KRW 1,500,00 shall be imposed on the first offense of KRW 300,00,000 in the judgment, and a fine of KRW 1,50,000 in the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 25, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment or one year of suspended execution for committing the crime of kidnapping, etc. in the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch for a minor in the same year.

8.2. Finality has been established.

1. On July 12, 2012, the Defendant revised the facts charged as above, since there was no impediment to guaranteeing the Defendant’s right of defense in his/her dwelling in the Gu, No. 3, 401 (D Building) (hereinafter “Defendant’s dwelling”).

(Investigation Records 7-9 pages) From July 30, 2012 to the same year

8.1. Even though the notice of call-up for training in the name of the third unit commander of the Army 2506 unit of the Army that caused the carried-over training (24H) of the homeland reserve forces conducted at the family training place up to the date was delivered, the above training was not conducted without any justifiable reason.

"2013 Highly 619"

2. The Defendant is a member of homeland reserve forces.

On September 20, 2012, the Defendant received a notice of call-up for homeland reserve forces training in the name of the third unit commander of the 2506 military unit in the name of the 3 unit commander of the Army, which caused eight-hour basic training (second supplementary training) conducted by the head of the family village on October 10, 2012 at the dwelling of the Defendant of the Gu C and 401 (D building) in Ansan-si.

However, the defendant did not receive the above training without justifiable grounds.

"2013, 620"

3. Around 03:20 on November 14, 2012, the Defendant: (a) while drunk in the first floor of the building of the Dong E-gu, the Defendant breaddd the victim F (19 years of age) who was a late-time employee of the entire workplace and was wraped to the Defendant even though he did not wrap the Defendant, she wn the victim’s bat; (b) fatd the victim’s bat; (c) fatd the victim’s batf; (d) fatd the victim’s fat; (d) fatd the victim’s fat; (e) fatd the victim’s fat; (e) fatd the victim’

Summary of the evidence of "2013 Highly 621" [2013 Highly 619]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written accusation;

1. Receipt of the call-up notice (2013 fixed 620);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of a muster notice;

1. A written accusation (2013 High Court 621);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the police of the F (not later than before the market);

1. The inquiry report, the US and the report on the results of confirmation, and the report on the investigation shall be a fixed date.

arrow