logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014.07.24 2014누40175
이행강제금부과처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is the same as the part of the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following cases. Thus, this is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The first instance court's decision 2 pages 7 "2, 2012.12" is dismissed as " December 2, 2011."

(b) Article 18(1) of the Administrative Appeals Act (hereinafter “Administrative Appeals Act”) of 14 pages 2 of the judgment of the first instance shall be deemed to be “Article 27(1) of the Administrative Appeals Act”.

2. If so, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow