The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license, destroyed a damaged vehicle by negligence in violation of the stop signal and did not immediately stop the damaged vehicle and take necessary measures to leave the scene; and (b) the nature of the crime is bad; (c) the Defendant committed the instant crime again despite the fact that the Defendant was sentenced to a fine for violating the Road Traffic Act (Free Driver’s License) on two occasions; (d) the Defendant is not subject to the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance subscribed to by the Defendant; and (e) the Defendant did not agree with the victims. In light of the fact that the Defendant did not agree with the victims, the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed to be too unreasonable.

2. Even when considering the above circumstances alleged by the prosecutor, considering the following circumstances, the defendant's mistake and reflects the defendant's wrong, the defendant's old age of 74 years, the defendant's thinking, memory, etc. has deteriorated due to his old age, and health conditions are not good, and the defendant's character, behavior and environment, the circumstances and result of the crime in this case, etc., and the circumstances after the crime, etc., are deemed unreasonable, and thus, the prosecutor's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.