The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On October 29, 2012, the complainant was notified by the prosecutor C of the Dong Office of the Busan District Prosecutors' Office as a summary order on October 29, 2012, but on June 13, 2013, the complainant was acquitted on the part of the alteration of private documents in Busan District Court's branch court's non-guilty, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 500,000,000 for defamation.

On November 8, 2012, the Defendant filed a complaint against the representative of occupants residing in Busan Shipping Daegu apartment, Busan Metropolitan City on charges of forging private documents and defamation. Accordingly, the Defendant received a notice from the prosecutor C of the Dong District Prosecutors’ Office in Busan District Prosecutors’ Office to summary a fine of KRW 700,00,00,000 and copied the notice of the result of the disposition of the accusation, and then put the copy into the mail for the representative of occupants along with the printed material that “the thickness of the representative of occupants” and publicly defames the honor

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Notice of results of disposition of inducements, accusations or complaint cases, and application of written judgments and statutes;

1. Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the criminal defendant has no same criminal record, reflects the fact that the criminal defendant has suffered damage from defamation by the complainant, and considering the motive and circumstance leading up to this case, the degree of damage, etc. to inform the