logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.10.07 2015고단1083
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 02:00 on May 1, 2015, the Defendant committed an assault, such as: (a) in front of Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si; (b) having used a taxi for driving C; (c) not paying a taxi fee; (d) having been reported and sent by 112; (c) having a slope box affiliated with the Sungnam-gu Police Station D commander of the Sungnam-gu Police Station, which was called upon upon receipt of 112, carried the Defendant’s left hand in order to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender; and (d) having the Defendant wear the above E, which was likely to wear the elbbow, put the Defendant into a blue with a blue, which was flue with the Defendant’s left hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression, investigation, etc. of the above police officers.

2. While the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender at the time, time, and place set forth in Paragraph 1, the Defendant expressed to the victim E that “I would see, she would see, she would see, she see, she would see, she would see, she she would see, she would see, she would see, she would she her, and she will her, she would stop her.” On the other hand, the Defendant expressed to the victim F, who is a police officer affiliated with the same police box, that “I she would she she she, she would see, she would her governance.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning E and F;

1. Application of C’s written laws and regulations

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 136(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment (the point of obstructing performance of official duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines (the point of being distorted by the defendant, the extent of obstructing performance of official duties is not serious, and there is no record of punishment other than that of fines once due to assault, etc.).

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow