logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.07.11 2018가합31651
정정보도 등
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The defendant is a terrestrial broadcasting company that broadcasts "DTV," and the plaintiff has worked for the defendant on January 2018 through the Director General of the Korea Press Bureau, the Senior Press Branch, and the Director General of the Korea Press Organization Headquarters.

The Defendant, on December 12, 2017, filed a report of the title “E” (hereinafter “instant report”) in the “C” program broadcasted on December 12, 2017, and the content of the instant report related to the Plaintiff is as shown in attached Table 2.

[Grounds for recognition] A’s assertion of the purport of the Plaintiff’s assertion of the Plaintiff’s assertion of the Plaintiff’s purport of the Plaintiff’s statement, video, and pleading as to July 25, 2012, the Plaintiff undermined the Plaintiff’s reputation and infringed his portrait rights by advertising the pictures containing the face of the Plaintiff as they are, without any measure, through the instant report, in collusion with the Plaintiff as the sewage of the NIS and replacing the writers and promoting them in return, although there was no fact that the Plaintiff conspired with the employees of the NIS (hereinafter “National Intelligence Service”).

Therefore, the defendant is liable to make corrective reports and damages.

(A) In addition, the Plaintiff’s indirect enforcement of the corrective report against the Defendant. Whether the instant report was factually made on the claim for a corrective statement or not does not directly express that the Plaintiff, in collusion with the NIS, replaced the “C” franchise and promoted the Plaintiff in return for the replacement of the “C” franchise.

Of the contents of the instant report, the part that points out that the Plaintiff’s replacement of the “C” franchise and promotion in collusion with the NIS was a conclusive report as if it were a fact of fact, and the Plaintiff’s replacement of the “C” writers on July 2012, 201.

arrow