logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.08.31 2016나57564
기타(금전)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in Gap evidence Nos. 4, 6, and 8, and Eul evidence No. 5:

The Plaintiff is a lessee of various construction materials. The Defendant is a constructor who subcontracted construction works with each of the following construction works (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the instant construction works,” and individually referred to as “Criuri Construction,” hereinafter referred to as “G Corporation”) among the construction works that newly build two multi-family houses with the size of 4th floor above the ground from the land located outside of Criju Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Criju Construction”), and with each of the construction works that newly build one multi-family house with the size of 4th above the ground from the G land at the time of Jjinjin-si, and one of the construction works that newly build two multi-family houses with the size of 20th above 3th 4th 1st 5th 1st 20, and the Plaintiff was paid the total of 30th 6th 6th 20 and 40th 206th 20, and 205th 207 3th 205th 206th 20.

‘' was concluded upon the completion of the adjustment of the contents.

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the Defendant was placed at the construction site of this case, and the Defendant was placed at the beginning of March 2014 after the locking, without paying the unpaid rent of construction materials, around February 2014.

arrow