1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On September 10, 2013, the network B (hereinafter referred to as “the network”) entered the stable Korea Transportation Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Safety Korea”) and served as a taxi engineer.

On November 20, 2013, the Deceased returned to 11:00 a.m. while he worked at around 06:00 on November 20, 2013 and operated a taxi, and around 13:30 the same day, the Deceased, who was the wife of the Deceased, arrived at the restaurant operated by Spocheon and was shot at the bar in his vicinity, and was shot at the bar and did not occur.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff reported to 119, and the Deceased sent it to the Government-Matern Hospital by the 119 first responders.

The Deceased died on February 20, 2014 while receiving continuous treatment at the above hospital.

On the death diagnosis report for the deceased, the direct deather of the deceased is indicated as the shock of a parod-blood, the intermediate carrier, the waste collecting, and the preceding physician as a high blood pressure cerebral blood.

On March 20, 2014, the Plaintiff, who is the wife of the Deceased, claimed bereaved family benefits and funeral expenses against the Defendant, claiming that cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral dys were caused by overwork and stress.

However, on April 28, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff through the Seoul Northern Vice Governor.

Therefore, the Plaintiff filed a request for examination with the Defendant pursuant to Article 103 of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act”), but the Defendant dismissed the Plaintiff’s request on September 17, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] The Plaintiff asserted the legitimacy of the disposition of this case as a whole by stating Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, and 16, and the purport of the entire pleadings, and whether the disposition of this case is legitimate, and the Plaintiff, on Nov. 20, 2013, served more than 60 hours a week prior to the occurrence of cerebrovascular infection (hereinafter “accident”), and served more than 64 hours a week prior to the occurrence of the disaster.

In addition, the plaintiff is working at night from three days before the occurrence of a disaster to three days before the occurrence of a disaster.