logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.10.06 2016노1649
근로기준법위반등
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below rendered on the defendant (five million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant's significant amount of wages and retirement allowances in arrears is recognized.

However, the defendant seems to have completed the payment of wages and retirement allowances to victims by selling factory machinery.

Defendant has no criminal record of the same kind.

In full view of the above circumstances and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and background of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court against the Defendant is somewhat unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's argument is justified.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is with merit.

【Grounds for the Judgment of the Supreme Court which has been written] Criminal facts and summary of evidence are identical to facts constituting a crime recognized by the court, and summary of evidence. Thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 109(1), Article 36 of the Labor Standards Act, Article 44 Subparag. 1, and Article 9 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act, respectively, concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination of the grounds for appeal for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall be based on the same reasons as the disposition, as seen in the judgment of the court below.

arrow