1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,130,100 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from February 15, 2013 to May 29, 2014.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and public notification: Public notification of the Gwangju B complex development project: Gyeonggi-do public notification C on June 29, 2012;

(b) Project operator: Defendant;

C. Subject to the expropriation ruling by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal on December 17, 2012: The date of expropriation, including 3,244 square meters of D forest land and 294 square meters of E forest land owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant lands as land listed in the following table, and each of the land is referred to as “land” only by lot numbers): February 14, 2013.

Part of the claim by the Central Land Tribunal for increase in compensation by the plaintiff on May 23, 2013

E. The Defendant deposited KRW 250,667,300 for the above compensation for losses, and the Plaintiff reserved the objection and received the above money.

(f) The appraised F’s market price appraisal (hereinafter “court appraisal”)’s appraisal of the land subject to expropriation shall be as follows: 3,244-22,214,000 229,837,400 234,541,200 4,703,700 E, 29420,139,000 20,829,829,829,9021,256,200,300 242,353,000 242,353,000 2526,67,6300 250 ,67,6305,707,405,405,130,100 294 294,70 294,70,000 29,00 2426,300 ,300 :

【Non-contentious facts, Gap 1 through 3, Eul 1 and 2 (including each number), the result of appraiser F’s market price appraisal, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. On January 29, 2007, each of the instant lands asserted by the Plaintiff is used as a field site after obtaining permission for conversion of mountainous district on January 29, 2007. The Defendant shall evaluate it as a field site and a road according to the actual conditions of use and compensate for losses. Moreover, inasmuch as the appraisal result at the stage of the instant adjudication was calculated by excessively lowering the amount of compensation without considering the consultation compensation amount of neighboring land, the Defendant is entitled to lawful compensation.

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes;

C. (1) Evaluation according to the realistic situation of use (A).