logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2014.03.27 2011도11544
업무방해
Text

The judgment below

Among them, the conviction part against Defendant D is reversed, and this part of the case is remanded to the Daegu District Court.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. As to the Defendants’ grounds of appeal

A. The part on the crime of interference with business (1) excluding the strike on July 2, 2008, and each part on the crime of interference with business to BV Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “BV”) and BJ (hereinafter “BJ”) among the strike on July 2, 2008 constitutes the crime of interference with business where a person interferes with another’s business by deceptive scheme or by force.

(Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act). The term "power of force" means all the forces capable of suppressing and mixing a free will of a person.

The strike as an industrial action that obstructs the normal operation of business by refusing to provide labor for the purpose of accomplishing the claim is a practical exercise that prevents the employee from providing labor under a labor contract, and thus collectively suspends the employee's assertion by imposing pressure on the employer. Thus, the elements constituting force as referred to in the crime of interference with business include the elements of force as referred to in the crime of interference with business.

However, under Article 37(2) of the Constitution, workers may be limited on the grounds of public interest, such as national security, maintenance of order, and public welfare, and the exercise of their rights should be justified, and is not absolute rights. However, in principle, workers have the right to independent association, collective bargaining, and collective action to improve working conditions as fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

(1) Article 33(1) of the Constitution provides that a strike as an industrial action does not always constitute the crime of interference with business, but only if it can be evaluated that the employer’s free will to continue to engage in business may be a suppression confusion because the strike as an industrial action takes place at a time unpredictable by the employer in light of the situation and circumstances before and after, and after, the time when the employer is unable to predict, resulting in serious confusion or enormous damage to the business operation of the employer.

arrow