logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.05.03 2018나2067344
청구이의의 소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following cases, and thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The seller of the 3rd side shall be referred to as the "seller" of the 5th side.

7. The plaintiff's "Plaintiff" in the 7th page shall be raised to "C".

7. The defendant's "the defendant" in the 7th 20th son shall be changed to "the plaintiff".

9 page 12 “Non-explosible” was not extinguished.

(1) In the case of this case, the defendant asserts that in the first and second instances of this case, as long as the judgment of the second instance became final and conclusive because the plaintiff did not raise any objection to the money indicated by the court as the sole responsibility of the plaintiff in the second instance, and did not raise any question after the judgment of the second instance was rendered, it became final and conclusive in accordance with the final judgment of this case, the receipt of the plaintiff's claim of this case on a different premise is in conflict with the res judicata judicata effect, and the defendant's claim against the plaintiff is not extinguished in the payment of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case.

A claim for damages in lieu of defect repair borne by a seller of an apartment building according to the contract, and a claim for damages caused by subrogation of a claim for damages in lieu of defect repair under the contract between C and D is the only ones.

arrow