logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.11.27 2018가단4707
건물인도 등
Text

1. Defendant C shall deliver to Defendant D the real estate listed in the separate sheet.

2. Defendant D, Inc.

Reasons

1. Defendant C

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Applicable provisions of Acts: Articles 208 (3) 2 and 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act (a judgment made by deemed as private capital);

2. Defendant D Co., Ltd.

A. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in the evidence Nos. 1 through 6, Defendant C entered into a lease agreement with Defendant C on November 13, 2017 with respect to the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) (hereinafter “instant real estate”) and the lease agreement between November 13, 2017 and November 12, 2018 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). It is recognized that Defendant C entered into an assignment agreement with the Plaintiff on the claim for lease deposit and sent a notice of transfer to the Plaintiff on November 13, 2017.

According to the above facts, since the above lease agreement between the defendant C and the defendant company terminated at the expiration of the term, the defendant C is obligated to deliver the real estate of this case to the defendant company as sought by the plaintiff on behalf of the defendant company. At the same time, the defendant company is obligated to pay the plaintiff the amount calculated by deducting all the expenses incurred under the lease agreement between the defendant C and the defendant company, such as the rent, management fee, etc. accrued until the transfer of the above real estate to the defendant company, from the 66,930,000 won.

3. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified.

arrow