beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendant is a company that operates a comprehensive overseas construction business and overseas construction technology service business in Yeonsu-gu Incheon, and the Plaintiff was subjected to disciplinary dismissal from the Defendant on January 26, 2015 while serving as the Vice Minister in the Industrial Plant Business Group on September 1, 2004.
B. On December 23, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a request for a review on the personnel evaluation of the instant case with respect to the Defendant Company on the ground that (i) around December 26, 2014, the Plaintiff was at the lowest grade D/D (Performance/Capacity/Competence) in the “Personnel Evaluation” of the Defendant in 2014,” and (ii) around December 23, 2014, the Plaintiff actively contributed to the solicitation activities through a bidding participant group’s performance by collecting and actively practicing the business information the Plaintiff tending, and (ii) attached documents supporting the Plaintiff’s claim for a review on the personnel evaluation of the instant case to the said written request for a review.
3) On January 2, 2015, the Defendant demanded the Plaintiff to attend the said personnel committee on the ground that “an inappropriate act deviating from the employee’s principal part in the process of raising an objection to the personnel evaluation of the instant case” and “no improvement of performance and work attitude is made even after the suspension of office in 2013” were the primary reason for the Plaintiff to be “no improvement of performance and work attitude”.
However, according to the Plaintiff’s request for the change of the date of attendance on the grounds of personal injury or illness, the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to appear on January 2, 2015 after changing the date of the Personnel Committee to January 8, 2015. On January 6, 2015, the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to appear on the ground that the date of the meeting was changed to January 14:00 on the ground that the date of meeting was changed to January 12, 2015.
After all, the plaintiff is given medical treatment due to traffic accident.